From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F075D385E827; Tue,  2 Apr 2024 20:41:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F075D385E827
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712090479;
	bh=1v9/bd6I5mN4kSHtKJhUDilbffXYXkrWiRfD+5105Yw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QrHU0+ANqKryTXji7NWEcTkTmo6zIlnIbRPTbrN1Jtt3D2zKm3ML/bSgq5Uy1KBak
	 eL64i0pIFhRlUUbgxgrtHFbUmURi/3yrQGTec6TkhRvnE62xhXSd87jfHubIcFzVFH
	 cnpTO6t2ExqTeq/CwW1YMXRJiAeXANHpL0XroZMY=
From: "michael.ragazzon at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110498] Spurious warnings stringop-overflow
 and array-bounds copying data as bytes into vector::reserve
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 20:41:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: michael.ragazzon at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110498-4-Wu4JvSruf4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110498-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110498

--- Comment #3 from Michael Ragazzon <michael.ragazzon at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> std::vector<bool> is a different issue and filed as PR 111118.

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I believe the warnings in the
description points to vector<bool> being used here as well. Perhaps they are
duplicates?=