From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2DC73385E450; Sat,  9 Mar 2024 07:17:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2DC73385E450
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709968620;
	bh=hGEWFznHyFKGhrPRQBYpesjpAZzHTYlpmFVRc+iLYTU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=O9piNfY/ysjA3eAEl76Q2BKiKtbfqmuRz8S5VeZe11tMAASA6JACKX3UFOFI0scUq
	 RHKr5tDPOjTSHRK63Iem7N5HpUIkSn6NSqcvVGe2uy1Vx8r+y6Dbk8Qqm6ToM4dteJ
	 SE/16RS26CTM0Kq4IslAF6NhpNlPH/zHrAQow23c=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110503] [13/14 Regression] Dead Code
 Elimination Regression at -O3 since  r13-322-g7f04b0d786e
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 07:16:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110503-4-oAQOklOEr7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110503-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110503-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110503

--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As you note, this feels like a failure to recognize that only one value can
actually satisfy the condition.=