From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9F6D03858C36; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:18:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9F6D03858C36
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698221935;
	bh=1eIV+payC47RFh/HIJwGBaY4URMNDiEMPuoGK4z9t0w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tgFiAfHFAE+EdDsfhRPTi8X34YBWKyNK/PybMBIMQvM5uLf9kFIpk3RLCIUPFbyS4
	 /XHqVt30sjrpiflEYRlEygYkRe80oaYNlXlY1iXjZlVAo6cT5y3WsB93shA2vBxv5Z
	 ctctL+ojDHlOo8b0muoATdH/KexWLZnF4+zJ7Szw=
From: "dale.mengli.ming at proton dot me" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/110520] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false nagetive
 with `*ptr = 10086`
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:18:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dale.mengli.ming at proton dot me
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110520-4-SzIXwLovBa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110520-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110520

--- Comment #2 from mengli ming <dale.mengli.ming at proton dot me> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Thanks for filing this bug.
>=20
> With trunk (for gcc 14) I correctly get a NPD warning (true positive):
>   https://godbolt.org/z/a5h38cz7d
>=20
> With gcc 13.2, I don't (false negative):
>   https://godbolt.org/z/PKnToYK8v
>=20
> I've been rewriting C string handling for gcc 14, so it's likely this now
> working is a side-effect of that.
>=20
> Keeping open to track adding a regression test for this.

Thank you for your explanation. (^_^)=