From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 032893858C27; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 11:34:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 032893858C27 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1688643298; bh=2EobAq7eUr5UlSJBNnwogyU9TpXpM4QcfWatKt5rdoM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xoPCgKfPad/Uql0SF+V8/DGqrrgvjh1jUfJcMNHj617jy2+n2sdVfl7fmQwu5/j84 rsLH04cPapNIpG5Ii6Vkspx3v2pm7maZcPopLZyeUyKk6hew99dqpotS8yGPH4eKxb p1HdEz6wcygXaJQdtknoHy5PHaV3Hn55FL5FwA9Q= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/110572] ld.lld: error: duplicate symbol: std::type_info::operator==(std::type_info const&) const Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:34:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110572 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I would argue that the root cause is that Clang does not conform to the platform ABI for mingw-w64, which requires __GXX_TYPEINFO_EQUALITY_INLINE= =3D0 to be defined.=