public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "malat at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110622] New: x86: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 06:28:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110622

            Bug ID: 110622
           Summary: x86: Miscompilation at O1 level (O0 is working)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: malat at debian dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

I can trigger an assertion in highway unit test suite on Debian/i386 when using
-O1 (does not happen at -O0).

Symptoms:

[...]
f32x2: Log1p(5.5968112995194757e-20) expected 5.5968112995194757e-20 actual 0
ulp 5.28754e+08 max ulp 3
[...]

For some reason the code return exactly zero (0) during a math computation of a
log1p function. The code runs fine at O2 on all other Debian arches (amd64,
mipsel, armel, ppc32 ...).

Since the return value is exactly 0, I suspect this is not a case of excess
precision (x87). This is not a hardware issue as I can reproduce it on multiple
hosts (Debian buildds machine, and x86 porterbox).

If I extract the math logic and call it in a `main` function, then the compiler
is able to optimize the code correctly (even at O2) and return appropriate
result (correct tolerance).

I did not observe any suspicious behavior under valgrind and/or -fsanitize.

             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-11  6:28 malat at debian dot org [this message]
2023-07-11  6:29 ` [Bug c++/110622] " malat at debian dot org
2023-07-11  6:30 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-07-11  6:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-11  6:33 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-07-11  6:33 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-07-11  6:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-11  6:44 ` [Bug target/110622] " malat at debian dot org
2023-07-11  8:25 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-21  9:44 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-21  9:48 ` [Bug target/110622] x87: Miscompilation at O2 level (O1 " malat at debian dot org
2023-09-21  9:51 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-21  9:56 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-21 13:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-21 13:42 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-21 13:45 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-21 14:29 ` malat at debian dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).