From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A4D653858D28; Tue,  1 Aug 2023 09:50:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A4D653858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690883451;
	bh=ISuGi9QMsCjRyy/oqlA1LC6AjM/KEILo4nSP2TtNw6M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=thmv7m/4EOFqLvS7salxzF0bUazFKtg0FVGiiqwvxdiTc3FXKiOqZp7ZghDIdEl6+
	 az9RekqqilNpHUFgJRmFaLEz1tIXq9jijQEJ6ZCQ5zb7ElfEuN0S69shSjgAPFQWMt
	 7aAsMr08Th/bQjYMX3njJk4cm6UCumpXOyuToT4U=
From: "hliu at amperecomputing dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110625] [AArch64] Vect: SLP fails to vectorize a loop as
 the reduction_latency calculated by new costs is too large
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 09:50:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hliu at amperecomputing dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110625-4-CY9WX46Xwl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110625-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110625-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110625

--- Comment #17 from Hao Liu <hliu at amperecomputing dot com> ---
> Thanks! I can reduce a testcase for you if you want :)

That will be very helpful. Thanks.=