From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5FB30385840B; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:22:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5FB30385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692926558;
	bh=woHjZad9ibPey6CgL/o7co725cxC2yAVHm4zW2AcZf4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rvqIbZsAy/j3ZVG7cgjQh9L1CMZLNmxitDwDQpwnGD2zR5A2c+L9ML8dlB8AWjcND
	 XoXgpCc+eNN/eKkqktLzyCiBziM/0zqqHqOT3UKdIhJ3zioVy+gDWvu+jTVXIga6TP
	 mV71nyXF+D4wp3NuEz3AN+0NWG3t8Nvrn7UJiB04=
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110628] [14 regression]
 gcc.dg/tree-ssa/update-threading.c fails after r14-2383-g768f00e3e84123
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:22:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110628-4-pCe1W50N8U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110628

--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> > patch posted
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628231.html
>=20
> Yay!  I stand ready to revert my ugly cover-up.
> I'll even give the posted patch a spin for cris-elf!

JFTR, as mentioned in a reply to the patch, unfortunately it regresses four
tests:
gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/pr95731.c
gcc.sum gcc.dg/pr46309-2.c
gcc.sum gcc.dg/torture/pr63464.c
gcc.sum gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr95731.c=