From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2E3913856944; Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:23:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E3913856944
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692116623;
	bh=Wqv/Uqz/nHjjYCZg8396sh+WukUkh73r5TqvyVEJD00=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=imrPgjpVS1igctCFcpI/SF8HQ/N7QO/6+cql70s8M59fJ/vXvZoMR6dTVXmdjk52D
	 /F3T1wSpFR6fkqOAqJlQFNfpXaffDqEvvlYY1syi5biz/SwVVvLKeQAGgNWerzdzFg
	 +i/urHuoWJOUuaQHmW8JjENXMFpVn1brf4JwCkWM=
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110628] [14 regression]
 gcc.dg/tree-ssa/update-threading.c fails after r14-2383-g768f00e3e84123
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 16:23:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110628-4-pJ1FKklxuo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110628

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A quick survey of recent test-results show this regression happens for many
targets.

Besides the reported:
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793193.html

Also fails for:
pru-unknown-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792102.html

s390x-ibm-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792106.html

m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793249.html

cris-axis-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793462.html

But, curiously not for:
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792111.html

i686-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/792104.html

aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793190.html

arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2023-August/793191.html

Not seeing any action for this regression for three weeks, for tracking
purposes I'm considering xfailing this test-case for cris-* after another w=
eek.=