public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aluaces at udc dot es" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/110644] Error in gfc_format_decoder
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:00:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110644-4-NRzVamkDuK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110644-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110644

--- Comment #8 from Alberto Luaces <aluaces at udc dot es> ---
No, I meant building *gcc* with those flags, but alas each gcc compilation
stage was still building with "-O2" so almost all of the compiler structures
are still optimized.

Nevertheless I did what you suggest and climbed up those 6 levels to find that
indeed expr->where has null fields.  To me it is not very strange since in my
code there is a structure that has copy and assignment members. gfortran is
arguing about them being called in another module, but of course there is no
physical place where they are called, as this is done implicitly by the
compiler when using those kind of objects, if I am correct.

I am rebuilding with your suggested gfc_current_locus change and reporting the
results.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-19 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-12 16:04 [Bug fortran/110644] New: " kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2023-07-12 17:46 ` [Bug fortran/110644] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13 19:41 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-16 14:32 ` kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2023-10-18 15:56 ` aluaces at udc dot es
2023-10-18 17:03 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-10-19  8:00 ` aluaces at udc dot es
2023-10-19 15:44 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-10-19 16:00 ` aluaces at udc dot es [this message]
2023-10-19 16:19 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-10-20 15:13 ` aluaces at udc dot es
2023-10-20 17:29 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-10-23 15:16 ` aluaces at udc dot es
2024-03-06  3:40 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-08 16:44 ` kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2024-03-08 16:56 ` kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2024-03-08 17:22 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2024-03-08 17:42 ` kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2024-03-08 17:42 ` kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2024-03-08 19:44 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2024-03-08 20:01 ` kyle.shores44 at gmail dot com
2024-03-08 20:32 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110644-4-NRzVamkDuK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).