From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5785E3858D3C; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 18:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5785E3858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689446157;
	bh=M1aM30vFWBf4CeBHdewuEyKPu0FHS0J+PMg2UeD8jtA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KUdCNS1YwSIjN9bdOzR/otVqThrIWbylZJlLtNWA5x3soLUDwHY9N6v1zkdv4Ympo
	 6Jqr8gNdl/kAZ3LXelf7h1d5C6Wk4XDKZvZMORfI3Zg10iVGFdzZ/5tUF6tLsDk5s6
	 3Hv8ys/iHH4psPUUaxgOO2j3/5vu2mMG3W16MToY=
From: "nrk at disroot dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/110676] [11/12/13/14 Regression] strlen of array[1]
 should not be optimized to 1 if using ASAN
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 18:35:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: nrk at disroot dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110676-4-8sgnv1ys1n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110676

--- Comment #3 from nrk at disroot dot org ---
Oops, forgot about https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107395.

But that bug was for missed warning opportunity, while this one is about AS=
an.
So I suppose both the bugs can coexist.=