From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A5EE63858CDB; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:03:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5EE63858CDB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689879834; bh=BzMOOYewPi9duO/i0TPc1Mpv+sHFTxuMLW4748Q+nZ8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QMYcxIVNwbhnTYZAERpB4BviwHVrkRbtdy0DC6FRinSBAFBa0ASAEP1BpKMNasHhj rt27nWvXfREwRPB8gAOcxwa10TFHUJe1O1ICqNiewqzrqCqT9jflOnzie2ETgCoF28 iGyjW3z024Hoz5VgEE6bZt5dCBFB3b2jXMJ5TjHc= From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/110717] Double-word sign-extension missed-optimization Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:03:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110717 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ubizjak at gmail dot com |unassigned at gcc d= ot gnu.org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #8 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #7) > The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : The patch implements transform for x86 targets only. Due to eventual STV transformation, x86 targets handle double-word operations in its own way. I'll left the target-independent implementation to someone else.=