From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E0B0E3858413; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:18:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E0B0E3858413
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689711480;
	bh=ZXYWABYVk/GKEC5mqBbADDMEbgABvjczfC5CBGon7vY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xhXsfH4YCKk6fr9XZalrxHHM5KIctUPzWCghcUT1mOI7yOdlOgq56gJbTf/tWjDO1
	 az9baqaf2vEBi/O+1CgCAgYEX0LjtFgGQbTZBfvTd88MsADrhNsVd4gojWMelLwp8Z
	 O2kxQEBuiD2NfmujwyomUhBkH2GwaBxTdqv0OXg8=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/110720] [13 Regression] Internal compiler error
 (segmentation fault) in gfc_expression_rank
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:18:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110720-4-FXVIPnm9J7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110720-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110720-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110720

--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> Looks like a dup of pr109948, which is fixed on 14-trunk.
>=20
> @Paul: do you think your patch (commit r14-1487-g3c2eba4) is
> backportable to 13-branch?

I know that it is :-)

I'll propose a backport to the list unless you want to OK it here?

Cheers

Paul=