From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3495A3857351; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:02:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3495A3857351 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689710533; bh=mX2aJX7kc1at9sgdSzLM6N056ZJ4ivcB7cIgDXJQC4A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f4o/AiaUhV/PJcqnTxZrV3GEQSdQ6Yc6SXMfPEmVOYRn3V9GxzSTpoeQ7Zdh8bF4H donwL4eGYHfjmlKhudlnw+G68GlPtdwfWIAtpokGa125RkLxNjUiKzLinYVsW2oJT8 lfj56AY8KXeiUlyezjtgYgHXnSWHtdpsYSjK70zU= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110724] Unnecessary alignment on branch to unconditional branch targets Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:02:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110724 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Plus if this is just the return case how important is that because maybe we should be inlining this kind of function. Plus this is a memcpy, why not j= ust use the expansion of __builtin_memcpy here (which is tuned for each target better).=