From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 396F23858434; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 396F23858434
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689710448;
	bh=PVi6uVpvaUAuVGKakJFKrvvRgM+57CcMUW7QgtAuS5c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=otiIrf+wRqLffGmaB/WtF1N6z+EOVz/ZFlGIlkZeX6ygQPeKcxjPWu/hZUyeA1SXV
	 +we9fIsgw6gQFIQZx4/uod5Kdz5AWnleIZVpJ0VmvTnky6ZOGv7XYXJR1wVU3pO7kT
	 m0gYkJt1k2wKPbOGeYt2SuWRI71ZOXaixY2YXODg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110724] Unnecessary alignment on branch to unconditional
 branch targets
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:00:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component
Message-ID: <bug-110724-4-Lw7LnpVuqP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110724

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|middle-end                  |target

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I noticed clang/LLVM does not do any alignment here but I doubt that is cor=
rect
thing to do.

Anyways I don't there is any bug here in the middle-end because the alignme=
nt
is what the backend requests. Now the question is the alignment needed or n=
ot,
that is for some x86 person to do benchmarking really. And if this needs mo=
re
than the simple heurstics than what is currently supported in the middle-end
well that is still up to the Intel/AMD person to benchmark.=