From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 329973856DC8; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:38:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 329973856DC8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689701921;
	bh=tq29HgCRsbwthFXWAcDHiQGcWAnd1Q3L8kFfZ69IHzc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=X7hsZwd5XHymCcR3oDzXLESRIzwrM2Jmjs/tE/pfZiblKYkEmQuzOTnKW+YdE2EI1
	 bz780AycOk7KPEpNpR0bxtpTUYfde0VKe0i2QbUB3zx3mK7lg9U90N471uycXN/Cmg
	 WfnbzWlDPW1H480r1MluzlBQ6gl5Ut7G4H/CMQ2I=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110724] Unnecessary alignment on branch to
 unconditional branch targets
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:38:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110724-4-vvNXmvgDLl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110724

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is by design.

Adding -fno-align-jumps makes the alignment go away.=