public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "javier.martinez.bugzilla at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/110724] New: Unnecessary alignment on branch to unconditional branch targets
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:11:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110724

            Bug ID: 110724
           Summary: Unnecessary alignment on branch to unconditional
                    branch targets
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: javier.martinez.bugzilla at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

https://godbolt.org/z/f7qMxxfMj

void duff(int * __restrict to, const int * __restrict from, const int count)
{
    int n = (count+7) / 8;
    switch(count%8)
    {
       case 0: do { *to++ = *from++;
       case 7:      *to++ = *from++;
       case 6:      *to++ = *from++;
       case 5:      *to++ = *from++;
       case 4:      *to++ = *from++;
       case 3:      *to++ = *from++;
       case 2:      *to++ = *from++;
       [[likely]] case 1:      *to++ = *from++;
        } while (--n>0);
    }
}

Trunk with O3:
        jle     .L1
        [...]
        lea     rax, [rax+4]
        jmp     .L5            # <-- no fall-through to ret
        .p2align 4,,7          # <-- unnecessary alignment
        .p2align 3
.L1:
        ret


I believe this 16-byte alignment is done to put the branch target at the
beginning of a front-end instruction fetch block. That however seems
unnecessary when the branch target is itself an unconditional branch, as the
instructions to follow will not retire.

In this example the degrade is code size / instruction caching only, as there
is no possible fall-through to .L1 that would cause nop's to be consumed.
Changing the C++ attribute to [[unlikely]] introduces fall-through, and GCC
seems to remove the padding, which is great.

             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 17:11 javier.martinez.bugzilla at gmail dot com [this message]
2023-07-18 17:38 ` [Bug middle-end/110724] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 17:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 19:07 ` javier.martinez.bugzilla at gmail dot com
2023-07-18 20:00 ` [Bug target/110724] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-19  6:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-19  8:26 ` javier.martinez.bugzilla at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).