From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7FCC13858C60; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:33:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7FCC13858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689716015;
	bh=uRF7mhpB8BcK4vNN0IYFG1qN2Ro6AEsXvDcBjaK0hXM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IVwQfjuvsbf4x9kLiA9EB18bPguXVhiSVZkWIrgw/Ozt31+/q1quoyIu+Q283irV3
	 AKyk4VGkngVq+s/J4WJFx7CWR1a4jsgKjeTIthCpyKgk4U0PjlGKKt2umQ1CfPP1vV
	 uGbh+W2GtJteUtb/fHVyXg0wCkiye7m+lt6wKW14=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/110728] should __attribute__((cleanup())) callback get
 invoked for indirect edges of asm goto
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:33:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110728-4-vZw0VbeRVs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110728-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110728-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110728

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That is even doing:
```
int g();
int h()
{
l0:;
    int x __attribute__((cleanup(test4cleanup)));
    if (g()) goto l0;
}
```
Produces the same result which is why I said this is the same as PR 91951
really.=