From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 184FF388215E; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:24:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 184FF388215E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701361456;
	bh=N9cmRlEYiFvvEdV0LFYxyu3XbLuaG9JbpOxps6sbkq4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=M7mDw5MVqaFER0GDkn7+e0CzQb498yXOXDLg5NqBs+94mmy9Ft3gW785Iamq3QzI5
	 CC0zxK0jFHj2YPO7uAZi2S0m+mUxNIyijuYQjdNb+wip/ooH4AR8sPEFfBg7/Aogfo
	 CaLMrE6W38q/ozBlFj7SeOYwvPrlzWglXQx+n5kQ=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declarations
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:24:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110734-4-D008oKpVcS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110734-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110734-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110734

--- Comment #10 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #9)
> (In reply to Julian Waters from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 56732 [details]
> > Attribute for asm declarations
>=20
> Please just fix this issue (i.e. make [[gnu::no_reorder]] work) instead of
> adding fancy new features.  Now we are in stage 3 of GCC 14 so any fancy =
new
> feature should be deferred into stage 1 of GCC 15.

Ok, I see you are only using no_reorder as an example.  Then try to make the
existing attributes work instead of adding a new one.=