From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6715B3858C62; Fri,  1 Dec 2023 06:22:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6715B3858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701411766;
	bh=RLzN14gXoKkUB+xDSjJ6bRHUalVqzgGUz3jOQPj9AFc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ur72pLz56+F2kfRSX2iqxSjN9/dHYpXd2XeuT1N4fFHqzFW/lJDkTssvK5/zmL67/
	 tFXt0iL0qm4s2CdzWW5cX+WevhX3bGhXOeQ3q1gK8eN4+l+NFXonbzIrk10FndGNLA
	 Ymj4HW7amC7fOxKx3KrmGXxbvht9ubEuT9pQCAv4=
From: "tanksherman27 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110734] Attributes cannot be applied to asm declaration
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 06:22:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tanksherman27 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110734-4-bZHmsjMkD8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110734-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110734-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110734

--- Comment #17 from Julian Waters <tanksherman27 at gmail dot com> ---
Looking at the source of the C++ parser it doesn't seem like asm (""); is
considered a statement but rather is correctly parsed as a declaration, see
cp_parser_block_declaration and cp_parser_declaration_statement. The no_reo=
rder
attribute is just a demonstration, I am aware it is not meant for asm
declarations, rather the error is in how the error message is formed, eg er=
ror:
expected primary-expression before 'asm' instead of error: expected
primary-expression before 'asm'=