From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D992A3850404; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:02:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D992A3850404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689843776; bh=WiXcidAzck4hRu1ezV6R256hqAf4jZdtcfrsubz1twY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MLbBlmh3QHqW6JjPM7+0s/Oz6EUvJBNmk532vRfYv8SGM4oTxDiTSeVQDgb8csJ3Q ZHKwKB0aoYxneN9Rd5k6O3V7zz7yH8DSsJc89wSgKfgkHBLu/QUQ0Tv/EZ8wS/994p USJDGXjDflv97uw631wlkvbbPvv8WGW1ugP6YEXQ= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110740] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-1.c Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:02:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110740 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, shouldn't this also apply to the main loop? I suppose we just never g= et such a case, but maybe with peeling for gaps we would? Eventually we'd hope we never would cost it as profitable. In any case the patch looks reasonable.=