From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1EBE63858C2B; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:10:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1EBE63858C2B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689847852;
	bh=EeZ+yCryXtbIcb2Kr2YQzr4PMd2EIvvTo6mSOuuvKIc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DLDFJqpRGWEkhx6q4+Rl6XLwe+hQy346Qhb3pGNA0x7l0jZYPfdgDplsq5e6bpF4x
	 LGPn7mDmpm42uhgAwlwNRfiXYgJY16QfaLnBp13s3Wy1uXnFSBHCzgjPWe2aX6ZHra
	 /aYL4QhM+Ia4hUoTImyWtprGDXGYaqf1xkRUNsss=
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110740] [14 regression]
 gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-1.c
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:10:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-110740-4-CF7uTBO5Gk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110740-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110740

Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #55587|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55590
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55590&action=3Dedit
patchv2

(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Hmm, shouldn't this also apply to the main loop?=20=20

Good question! I think it can. I've updated it to make it not epilogue only.

> I suppose we just never
> get such a case, but maybe with peeling for gaps we would?  Eventually we=
'd
> hope
> we never would cost it as profitable.

Yeah, it forces this assumption.=