From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2F99D3853D0C; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:07:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F99D3853D0C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689869237;
	bh=9WQrKdkILYjuBlb6fiBle+vKjdbgBmbRU1R4yAhJVTw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bnaZI7FG/KhlKXsKbovRVWwkfZd0uSSBb7jLqGHMy9DmkQYoZYKClyWZw8LRDmuhs
	 AJIgURSteFEfSA0lxvzYnic0lRe9gZQmEVMBtQaJ0PHKEKOWkVBs8O5XLhm1fielzP
	 QBk7EfCWMfQl/6SsfRTDIWrGdMw8V0Dco7N16dmA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110748] RISC-V: optimize store of DF 0.0
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:07:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110748-4-xjxkgWGxUA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110748-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110748-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110748

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
aarch64 has the following function to check for +0.0:
```
/* Return TRUE if rtx X is immediate constant 0.0 (but not in Decimal
   Floating Point).  */
bool
aarch64_float_const_zero_rtx_p (rtx x)
{
  /* 0.0 in Decimal Floating Point cannot be represented by #0 or
     zr as our callers expect, so no need to check the actual
     value if X is of Decimal Floating Point type.  */
  if (GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (x)) =3D=3D MODE_DECIMAL_FLOAT)
    return false;

  if (REAL_VALUE_MINUS_ZERO (*CONST_DOUBLE_REAL_VALUE (x)))
    return !HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (GET_MODE (x));
  return real_equal (CONST_DOUBLE_REAL_VALUE (x), &dconst0);
}
```
Which most likely needed for the new predicate ...=