From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 57C4238560A7; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:37:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 57C4238560A7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689845864; bh=boUcuLqzX4hP6oo+nwB2sqvgCSIoPMC3H0HiehiPf5s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lq9agt49eYLKiZX2Ne2eXhdxUg18nr6Oh9v2uxEbObYa/OZ/FGnjxHdib8pp4V/8H 5qKzrgM4/l5gNS6/utV6fV7SlERos1mrZF/J9rp0OIiy2kCyHVDo1KfATQhAuNnK2r RanQNm1nF8XBP/MVBVwAqNF4yUirki5lIql+fejU= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110751] RISC-V: Suport undefined value that allows VSETVL PASS use TA/MA Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:37:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110751 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- OK, so TA is either merge or all-ones. Not sure how you can use MA at the moment since you specify an existing operand in your target hook. As far as I can see there's no value the target hook can provide that matches any of the implementation semantics?=