From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B762B3858002; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:10:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B762B3858002 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1691053836; bh=Ip1oy8kcQWjpIgu+eByism+RNnfhdUFLFMENzhBFMt0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hBGV3vrW1ys8a2CpxpWPhAobcnIHRTsi8rlvEiXd778A2yXtDSKJp6m9mH4ajF8+V m4QHsuHOq8rVZJ63bHYlPy5Vk8t0FZEBlXK2nLjEB09yBlTC1+c/Awze12IJ3kZXv6 PMonVWMSgsnGD5xNVU1phu/80MiqlPvhGgopfp8k= From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/110753] [14 Regression] ICE in meet_with_1, at ipa-cp.cc:1057 Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 09:10:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110753 Aldy Hernandez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- The intersection of two mask/value pairs is being pessimized incorrectly. MASK 0x0 VALUE 0x1 (value is known to be 1) MASK 0xfffffffffffffffc VALUE 0x0 (low 2 bits are known to be 1, everything else is unknown). irange_bitmask::intersect() is intersecting these to: MASK 0xffffffffffffffff VALUE 0x0 (i.e. totally unknown value). This is causing union_bitmask() to return a change when none actually occur= red, because we end up losing the bitmask. Mine.=