From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D9C703858C52; Mon,  6 Nov 2023 02:39:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D9C703858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699238340;
	bh=5qFzkp9PiOTUo0brpcFUzqVepcIJTMk14BQy+mhxF9A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fDpHGOTUoKiY53vh6jsf5EeNzha+ehSCmGoPVC4A3TXpvPP15Zuwq+5tmScmoRo12
	 +amW6cbOMfG0OhFl0USoQ8M8yF0kuOkLBCUpP9afJNt0Bu1XHTCkdpp6T8ve94NQw7
	 ssXLMTo7Fc0M3xkhXIl+qsSKkM5BgdClln2ecqWk=
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110755] [13 Regression] Wrong optimization of
 fabs on ppc64el at -O1
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 02:38:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cc
Message-ID: <bug-110755-4-NoukBKDYjl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110755

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|powerpc64le                 |powerpc64le, aarch64
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As alluded already in comment #3, this bug is generic: I built gcc-13.2 and
verified that it also exists (or perhaps more correctly put, existed) for
aarch64, for that version.=