From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B4AAE3858C53; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:28:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B4AAE3858C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689884887; bh=m6TYF+9w1NKqfwVPzm7yvnia71KQh87mQYCx+zflL5g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WB2PdzoCXVT+gInGM06q/ue5VeZNY4t8dD88+DlDPztBzhI6yvP1yPdyBVGwVEJiB aP4MtUxa+gvL066NB0PYqDfMQU0K6Cq0SnmDe0Mbl5NpLtoEI3oVt2AUDz2Jmt5W4i +xjhygVHe4ZpfIf4hx6axGqqLSfVXqQPGpm98PVI= From: "aurelien at aurel32 dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110755] Wrong optimization of fabs on ppc64el at -O1 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:28:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aurelien at aurel32 dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110755 --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Hmm, this might be the case where you need -frounding-math since we don't > expectly implement the pragma. Indeed the original glibc code is compiled with -frounding-math. However ad= ding it or not doesn't change the resulting code.=