From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9ACAD3858C78; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 07:39:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9ACAD3858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1690789191; bh=bV5wd3MN+kPsbciNT498MarU071dsOO0zIulgQlgSWk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vNr2/eyXiWSackcVhbzFFhnbxT2QfsYVDANTcXifsPDYzV0iADXysmCPjBIOIT0AQ QjQ/KWUiVHTvOP0tpFZ7qv8OVfr8QHWalVLbdK/gL8ZPY2R13dCR86YfRocmbswlaa Ypwo55aI97dUXaQFsOe/RARySjtAq3FQDcxOi4x0= From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110758] [14 Regression] 8% hmmer regression on zen1/3 with -Ofast -march=native -flto between g:8377cf1bf41a0a9d (2023-07-05 01:46) and g:3a61ca1b9256535e (2023-07-06 16:56); g:d76d19c9bc5ef113 (2023-07-16 00:16) and g:a5088dc3f5ef73c8 (2023-07-17 03:24) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 07:39:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110758 Jan Hubicka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- Fixing profile update in loop distribution fixed the regression and we get better result than before. The first tester still shows regression compare= d to July last year, but we have PR106293 to track this.=