From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 87BFD3858C41; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 12:27:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 87BFD3858C41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1699014478; bh=5CyQwxZiKkFDZJcILQfcmRQaf2GlsKtzZA8wO2J1syY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WXLznHyesTfPIUcOrLy/J68KMQpWA46bm656wmWvSU25LU4KY0HlMv04nhlfRhkli dx+sGC2XvJ1cEjFktAYWgBCvpM/YkufoJGUr6HeEDAui+Hyiu1YvtuQVYNgzzqKECr w6X6WVgq5GRqIJIzypDbY5LHz2UusrJ68KveN218= From: "shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110769] [14 Regression] ICE in adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1023 since r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175 Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 12:27:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110769 --- Comment #5 from Shaohua Li --- (In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #3) > I tried to bisect it and it was bisected to r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175, which = is > different from the bisection point in bug110641 I probably bisected to the wrong commit. I bisected it again and it should = be r14-2675-gef28aadad6e=