From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E393F3858D3C; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 15:01:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E393F3858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690729310;
	bh=cSQ0xwAX3qx3kdYECtDHMNPvlYdqrkmGb4hE6P8tPTk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iHsmmfrI41hT0wYv2f0OzIaGaJkxb+YUWLcxBFb9WjSJ7KHxZDUH/ui4VkzDKWoz6
	 CgjN0AxlJwfpA0XzFiKrTWdC9gj7ArqxFpulJYSaDtXa+SSo059v61m4qyGGKMJsF+
	 ai8UViGhtBno36V5X+I6BgzS945PpIQ9w3ms9p2Q=
From: "shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110769] [14 Regression] ICE in
 adjust_loop_info_after_peeling, at tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc:1023
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 15:01:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110769-4-vZ4FuhIRVb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110769-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110769-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110769

--- Comment #3 from Shaohua Li <shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch> ---
I tried to bisect it and it was bisected to r14-2674-gd0de3bf9175, which is
different from the bisection point in bug110641=