From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AA87D3853D0F; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:11:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AA87D3853D0F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689984661;
	bh=bxwkGXfsKQ6bmHxYIVzkGaDn2Dcg8Z0NJHeOwGwRSwc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KBOtu56hdBX1cthjNj4D23bkFlhVuhrG3BHoYWAmIqrWjR7dhrAj9ylApb1iLA4Sg
	 e0yAqMzaMDHUZbL4Lrb3rbj5u2eJTUI8KtFQFa6vo43dftKxfFesrKrOI/r/01em4j
	 GnvyUJrQeG0foCF+R77inJQ0WKrGQ/O8myiMX3MQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110772] strange code generated for bit-field access
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:11:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110772-4-9sscq3LAO6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110772

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note 10.5.0 was the last release in the GCC 10.x series, can you test out G=
CC
11.4.0 out?=