From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 952243858D1E; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:50:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 952243858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690041014;
	bh=DMFtPjuye5Ft036+f0uwt5QJlFeKX15H6GW8szzE0vY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Vkr1KXlAt71zjszx+sOi/zqP7sZ67/pcFcGT/YunQj6u12715xR87jbWpcDUe3Att
	 Zdmm9PFdUuGTYfyTZw5G6CtWFGEQx+0wGIYmkQ7oGkLyJrtI2jrCTyjXX+Pz7q4Ffu
	 QGgeF73vGCHP+ssOGLtXld63bKxjOwu7aiitrLI8=
From: "roland.illig at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110772] strange code generated for bit-field access
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:50:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: roland.illig at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110772-4-nTjeszliwp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110772

--- Comment #8 from Roland Illig <roland.illig at gmx dot de> ---
When I compile the attached code with "ARM GCC 10.5.0" and "-O2 -fPIE -ftra=
pv"
on godbolt.org, the generated code is correct (you can search for "#327" in=
 the
output and then go back one branch).

The code generated by godbolt.org "ARM GCC 11.4.0" with "-O2 -fPIE -ftrapv"
looks good as well.

So it could also be that the NetBSD version of GCC is missing a bug-fix or =
two.=