From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 59F753853D0F; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:02:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 59F753853D0F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689984133;
	bh=DhPMGFBVuih4+mmqV1rZZ+GAuQvVkknKLTZBz00Kvvc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MZvgxYmS3it8hiWd8O5SH6hcR8bYVFFvmGiuF4Ax78UapF8Q3W5T7n8hMvjTep9lo
	 KTtxLa0LTO3SEHgN94wvX4d25EvqrX+RqJauXWtRpF5IpxUJPiOVgEJrRjSD+LHCPA
	 iYUe+Vca8wATjwVhVAT49NN2VC1CjfPy96SqiX5Y=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110773] [Aarch64] crash (SIGBUS) due to atomic
 instructions on under-aligned memory
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 00:02:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component
Message-ID: <bug-110773-4-Song9DiLon@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110773-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110773

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|target                      |middle-end

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
this happens on x86_64 too:
        movq    storage+12(%rip), %rax

This is almost definitely not atomic too ..=