From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C43FB385DC0C; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 01:15:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C43FB385DC0C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689988523;
	bh=gsrTxCwiL1YfGGKIEFhKSW1kxOvZsI76A+O3rd95ga0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gz+9HJURz0wmnKQ1rW3f8dfYZKg72s9GpleCallYj+3eXhT/tWNe/BwLqxWfBapzQ
	 rbK/p2U9impHvr3BTV6drOuryX71DqJvNGtsyKa9zbIUEPuL3GYwApOCbT7uUZueG2
	 nGolp52m8xMLBIGysp4jZRiEeRe/Y8kDBAdqJkJg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110774] Ambiguous partial ordering with non-dependent
 function parameter type and nullptr
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 01:15:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110774-4-80kLuUJBEh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110774

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
But these function declarations are not partial specializations as far as I
know.=