From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1AC3C3858D39; Tue,  7 May 2024 13:29:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1AC3C3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715088583;
	bh=9E71db/01DrOVRK/JrQcbwvOTxMRo+LgUfCTymKS8d8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=X58DcFIeaPHLNdmMWhwJ8jgX4rfMYyfXXYY7GQ5l1sMBTBou3lNzyCxwafvn+5mQU
	 FbyDpOaeyRcxokRSd1uqaiFP7uNdBEluYeEtOuVDErpNr5tSKMSwgZ7YXIadMNDgfQ
	 aPoZVF6MIhoBzvwNdp8WgA+bLVh/QoU5YvK5+B60=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/110775] [12/13/14/15 Regression] abort define causing
 issues in tsystem.h
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 13:29:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110775-4-dozxBBsF4f@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110775-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110775-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110775

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, we don't want people to redeclare __builtin_* functions.=