public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in armv8l-linux-gnueabihf
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:14:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110796-4-jVUoOqndl8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110796-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796

--- Comment #7 from Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org> ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5)
> OK, so it signals FE_INVALID on the first test. Can you run this with the
> same options, and see what happens?

It ran normally:

thiago.bauermann@tcwg-jade-03-dev:~/tmp$ cat test-1.c
#include <fenv.h>
#include <stdio.h>

void
ftrue (float x, float y)
{
    if (!__builtin_iseqsig (x, y))
        __builtin_abort ();
}

int
main ()
{
    volatile float f1, f2;

    f1 = 0.f; f2 = 0.f;
    if (fetestexcept (FE_INVALID)) printf("Invalid 1\n");
    ftrue (f1, f2);
    if (fetestexcept (FE_INVALID)) printf("Invalid 2\n");

    return 0;
}
thiago.bauermann@tcwg-jade-03-dev:~/tmp$
/home/thiago.bauermann/.cache/builds/gcc-native-aarch32/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/thiago.bauermann/.cache/builds/gcc-native-aarch32/gcc/ test-1.c 
-fdiagnostics-plain-output    -Os  -fsignaling-nans -ggdb3  -lm  -o ./test-1
thiago.bauermann@tcwg-jade-03-dev:~/tmp$ ./test-1
thiago.bauermann@tcwg-jade-03-dev:~/tmp$ echo $?
0
thiago.bauermann@tcwg-jade-03-dev:~/tmp$

> One surprising thing is that the directive "dg-add-options ieee" in the test
> did not apparently add any other option for IEEE conformance…

Ah, that's an interesting thread to pull. I'll investigate if there's any
option we should be adding.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-25 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-24 22:36 [Bug middle-end/110796] New: " thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2023-07-24 22:39 ` [Bug target/110796] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-24 22:50 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2023-07-25 15:13 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 16:44 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2023-07-25 16:50 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 17:13 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 17:14 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org [this message]
2023-07-25 17:17 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 17:18 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 17:48 ` thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
2023-07-26 16:58 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-02 10:38 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-05 14:49 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110796-4-jVUoOqndl8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).