From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E7ABF3857803; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:13:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E7ABF3857803
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690297992;
	bh=kJOpBO6RRCX5DN8w6hDKLHfbGKtSnaaEXQ+G3Z0NSUs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ugLGvY2Mwg+0CV4JHazoaJGNarY9eO3/wNrPhpPZNgABBUA6rx8gVu/ShYA0zUeMl
	 HdWUFJstFMedEC2oo8EdrI9BJ/dl561+bA3by0oCJBaMe87JRHsQQmKgdyCD/roNlA
	 XWglp0XOlj8zat8LMgZhlfdWaXyhf2uZAS/NFCK0=
From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110796] builtin_iseqsig fails some tests in
 armv8l-linux-gnueabihf
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:13:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110796-4-qj3I71crwu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110796-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110796-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110796

--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> =
---
Do the failure only occur at -Os? Does it pass at -O0, -O1, -O2?
And could you possibly run builtin-iseqsig-1.c under gdb and obtain a
backtrace?=