From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CE2283858C66; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:50:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CE2283858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690282230;
	bh=Obr+vERqiMG0qFP0fjS23tMELAnNA71aGpALZKprp/U=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=J5X7bWIOUARVwNXKzJrRLlsWEwxI7wGtSXYwRBm0Z8fgIcpCT/mK4uOg2iIQbqMjr
	 ro6bPU/0TBPHEzW+5J2p7JLx061rMYxXYphJ6ERvBOWI3OYX7vmSYLa9/5bbSE7sju
	 ASNZoijiW1Rwqmymh+6FqaF7Ji/fPxvGo+k9o+Hk=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTEwNzk4XSBbMTIgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0gVGhlIHJl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?dXN1bHQgb2Ygc2l6ZW9mIG9wZXJhdG9yIGZvbGxvd2VkIHdpdGggYW4gJ3Vu?=
 =?UTF-8?B?c2lnbmVkIHR5cGVkZWYtZWQgZ2VuZXJpYyBpbnRlZ2VyJyB0eXBlIGlzIGFs?=
 =?UTF-8?B?d2F5IDQgYnl0ZXPvvIhleGNlcHQgY2hhcu+8iQ==?=
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:50:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status keywords
Message-ID: <bug-110798-4-L1NnjkfKXg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110798

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needs-bisection             |

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I almost positive this was fixed by r14-159-g03cebd304955a6 which was
> backported to GCC 13 branch r13-7277-ga713aa4f47ac1e (for 13.2.0) .

Yes, bisection confirms it. So this is a dup.

Aside: I'm not sure I'd call this a wrong-code bug. The testcase would be
simpler if it used static_assert instead of assert, which would make it
accepts-invalid / rejects-valid instead.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108099 ***=