From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2B7AE3858C2B; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 05:30:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B7AE3858C2B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1690349418; bh=OUgUa65vNUOgLGeJBDvZFcdJIR0JVsa20dasZXPDuIQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=shjdxC43erCRncbxa8JvaTf0AGirabFpoolkMq0wONLW0iWSRL9hTyUfPdeYZn7kz N626SRKx059CFOy6PDtYiXCQ4GOJPVD4pyrprNJhqSR1pe8vrE06UitxmyWPUcpMYZ GbSJSFCiavZL5zd1khcO6rrGHbTM938AB2dBZTHc= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/110810] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1068 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 05:30:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110810 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- You don't even need it to be a new or even ~X there: ``` struct Foo { Foo() {} ~Foo() {} }; struct X { Foo data[4]; }; template void f() { X{}; } ```=