From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A5D453857C5A; Fri,  4 Aug 2023 08:51:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5D453857C5A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691139087;
	bh=ruTyfUBxpEyPaNzRAd4Sfb2v9sh7dMaHkGziaZTVYao=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=h90Jd3bNLN3B3lTW1ZOXx/DE8PJ1rakgneaZf8Nf5QBzFx2zmg3irjU0XRW0UhH8E
	 Ro6enWwID6xcwnk8k1rV2YNF7ZxEeC6j5X0VjYy6vcIWOP8yJO2pkJ2t9HkeHRrt+7
	 zvRzjQDSFP+RinU6qsGfdXJO2cvKnnKSeKaMEyug=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110869] [14 regression] ICE in decompose, at
 rtl.h:2297
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 08:51:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110869-4-JvzFZKiAyT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110869

--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #12 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot
> ibm.com> ---
> I have done a test with a cross-compiler and it looks to me as if we need=
 -O2
> instead of -O1 on Sparc in order to trigger the optimization.  Can you gi=
ve the
> attached patch a try?  Sorry for all the hassle.

We're getting there.  The -1.c and -2.c tests PASS now, however the rest
still FAILs: they lack "narrow comparison"... completely.=