From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2E58B3857723; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 09:42:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E58B3857723 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1691142148; bh=u/j+O0ui2ivh1TsbtMYxD5KbdfFUJvUquL9CdImtt88=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y1xSmUVn1YIuL9yUbJtXtDJruq137fB9FnM7CD2XUww7FJ+Mcma9jbGQAVj1/wqWL +NACL5dBwsyAm0hpydd4cqrJVzYqRQEXvsO9rJbGx8sxz4d6LeKZn0X39V+fJOR6Dp EzL6EEaUYCuZJb5faB9RESi3DWs5MuZaFsajeJjY= From: "stefansf at linux dot ibm.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/110869] [14 regression] ICE in decompose, at rtl.h:2297 Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 09:42:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: stefansf at linux dot ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110869 --- Comment #14 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- For -3 and -4 I can confirm that we do not end up with a proper comparison during combine which means we should just ignore these on Sparc. I'm currently puzzled that -5 and -6 are actually processed on Sparc (32 or= 64 bit) at all. Shouldn't this: /* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 } && ! target { sparc*-*-* } } } */ prevent this?=