From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ADE643858CDA; Wed,  2 Aug 2023 09:17:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ADE643858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1690967835;
	bh=WVTuuYTBUA88Eh7AFlgHc4YfaY02obXOrVeQzKNcNT4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=knB+1J4UsrpuLmCpEBR9ujyCtASUs+VUMABwYLBjJh6WuD2zfuSqCObwz/wt1t8lv
	 CT6vMQEAe9Ry8IGb8iIeIfZSgc5zgmUul2l8yIE58dwIf8bt95aCJ8y5NpektvqGRs
	 r/6LTW02ga/4l+QP4hAc7pnJFjK1wXQUds43bDs8=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110869] [14 regression] ICE in decompose, at
 rtl.h:2297
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:17:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110869-4-sczlHTeVKq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110869

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #4)

> This would solve test cases cmp-mem-const-{1,2,3,4}.c.  For
> cmp-mem-const-{5,6} we have that the pre-optimization already chopped the
> 64-bit constant into a 32-bit constant and thus leaves us with nothing to=
 do
> here.  I'm not entirely sure how we handled such cases in the past.  Thou=
gh,
> one solution would be to simply exclude sparc from this test:
>=20
> /* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 } && ! target { sparc*-*-* } } } */
>=20
> Would that be ok?

I guess that's best for Eric (Cc'ed) to say.=