From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C14863858000; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 18:41:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C14863858000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692556884;
	bh=1Eb4KyVlOC/jDyZ7+7HfLzpgcRfQJdQ4Acmgj6yA8LI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BVeTGHV8s2kkaP4QiYQhLJgNwwGbn2qTvCX0C85b5k0G+940Hvrnn493WCRTV6ApJ
	 NzGsLCMEkfJyNsXfpGhXOhb7O9GkCO+uZ31eZS37it0mHJArugV/8ofyUJAB1eQTW3
	 +XPJzGx2LL6k7ZofNneIWRCPgeo3HpGW3CL9ZUwM=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110919] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination
 Regression at -O3 since r14-1691-gbc5a2c2e793
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 18:41:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110919-4-7g4ArWYwLE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110919-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110919-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110919

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Or take:
```
_Bool g(int a, int b)
{
  b &=3D 1;
  _Bool t =3D a =3D=3D b;
  _Bool e =3D a !=3D 0;
  _Bool g =3D t & e;
  return g;
}
int g0(int a, int b)
{
  b &=3D 1;
  _Bool t =3D 1 =3D=3D b;
  _Bool e =3D a =3D=3D 1;
  _Bool g =3D t & e;
  return g;
}
```

These two should produce the same code generation.=