From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ECA26385840B; Tue,  8 Aug 2023 07:19:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ECA26385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691479172;
	bh=+2QJAs8kGPJbnVMhhhbK4fKPQo2sST54PpapIfjx5Ec=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aJAs3A6DeOjtleQ7Zs0gRBHgREfFa9V+oSUg3Yp8caiWdRntoUPVB2h9BQ6jjFKEW
	 SGJ8p2WBQYRUuneyKsFgE3BDAE1zcAg1RJBn0dKh7211RWkUfl59dt8TCWjP/u0eIg
	 wwJC2FwLDwBvXW29xz/cZFq+bL9iLBQI+4nRYnms=
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110924] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at
 -O{s,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:19:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110924-4-vtFEM70JBm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110924-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110924-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110924

David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Confirmed.
>=20
> I am 99% sure it was r14-2946-g46c8c225455273

Perhaps it would be worthwhile to ask Richard to have a look.=