From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 042AA3858C30; Mon,  7 Aug 2023 05:51:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 042AA3858C30
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691387517;
	bh=KZeiLCYmoR3SPdsNxqUAh5Yvgf0dAOv6e3nGTFaHxgk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Hfn4US0EB5r7tpFbBeqlr14SmIVrDGZc1jZ3KuT2X6H332/E4LYlSW/bQDLqQccRW
	 JOnYNQtDrZtxsLiafRQ8OlduthGyV3Gob94jhlnROddlN9FHEmx2cXG37mtZFKfuVy
	 DYxLQYKYVrBGyxAj1katWR/BjziKK1XnAUwKOgqs=
From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110926] [14 regression] Bootstrap failure
 (matmul_i1.c:1781:1: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type
 'i' or 'n', have 'w' (rtx const_int) in vpternlog_redundant_operand_mask, at
 config/i386/i386.cc:19460)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 05:51:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110926-4-uw604Pbmlw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110926-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110926-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110926

--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7)
> Thanks for identifying the problem. Please don't rename the argument to
> 'op_mask' though: the parameter itself is not a mask, it's an eight-bit
> control word of the vpternlog instruction (holding the logic table of a
> three-operand Boolean function). The function derives a three-bit mask fr=
om
> it.

I'll rename it as ternlog_imm8 to avoid confusion.=