From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BEF8D3858C5E; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:43:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BEF8D3858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700095426;
	bh=+T5AKLN7u4UFUh+g6igACgB/ndw62RBfT1nRKmTCAV4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UrPtB6KwAmc40tJiBAyBincLSPGsfx/gdGupLFjFQRw/US2f8FTYqLI8wNg53yNuM
	 4KRHVcdd0j582tuEw1timG7HDb0SEEgZsS3SbuUlcM7AekYKAeZiF4mkwmX43l4Hdy
	 V4QlVzxChDcVkmWGHSV4bMONT1uLfbmcLRfYzR84=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110938] [11/12/13/14 Regression] miscompile if implicit
 special member is deleted and mutable
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:43:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110938-4-GhWSVio5oy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110938

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> But I don't think that will have affected the __is_trivially_copyable(Y)
> result.

Maybe the __is_trivially_copyable is due to the same reason why PR 112544 s=
hows
up; ::operator=3D is not synthesized to be deleted yet.=