From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EF5123857C5A; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:40:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EF5123857C5A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1691588410; bh=egt3EBXtMqsXyahC0mJVjSGAvDBoL6Kqhh9ZJW4yl/U=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yJI5f+lH6F2zIgoA/9VKbSEGRZYzFJMRwNxqIimgbuqOvI5UjOLCZQFb0k1BYWmCU 3BLHTo3XpxjHlVsK46e9BOolOGF9wNUiXvlgjSOdaBTe68ev0FezdThApebpN8U+2u nnvMSJznyDErNlPapdwiYGm6lv9m1WUGV+w/FDN0= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 13:40:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110956 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Thomas Neumann from comment #1) > The assert says that the code tries to de-register a frame that it did not > register before or that was deregistered before. Did we assert for these cases before? Can we "safely" continue, doing noth= ing?=