public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/110956] [13, 14 regression] gcc_assert is hit at gcc-13.2.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c#L291 with some special library
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 11:18:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110956-4-jBSCT3wNpy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110956-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110956

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Neumann from comment #1)
> The assert says that the code tries to de-register a frame that it did not
> register before or that was deregistered before. If you see that failing you
> might want to add some print statements to
> __register_frame_info_{tables_|}bases  and  __deregister_frame_info_bases.
> But the example that you included in the report does not seem to trigger the
> assert but crashes during unwinding instead? This has to be looked at in a
> debugger.

Given my nightmarish experiences debugging unwinder issues, I guess I'll rather
start with a reghunt to identify when this started.

> I do not have access to Solaris. If you can give me remote access to a
> suitable machine I am willing to debug this, otherwise you must check
> yourself why the crash happens.

There's still no Solaris/x86 box in the cfarm, unfortunately, only
Solaris/SPARC.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-09 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-09  7:33 [Bug libgcc/110956] New: " sumbera at volny dot cz
2023-08-09 10:40 ` [Bug libgcc/110956] " tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-08-09 11:09 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-09 11:15 ` [Bug libgcc/110956] [13, 14 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-09 11:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-08-09 13:40 ` [Bug libgcc/110956] [13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-09 13:53 ` tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-08-09 17:02 ` ro at manam dot mail-host-address-is-not-set
2023-08-09 22:55 ` tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-08-10  6:49 ` tneumann at users dot sourceforge.net
2023-08-10  8:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-08-10 11:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-08-11 15:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-11 15:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-09  9:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-10  3:46 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110956-4-jBSCT3wNpy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).