From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 56BC4385C6ED; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:52:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 56BC4385C6ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1692964358; bh=xB0Cb+zhHgMP5Bp0r/gdy0LwdJdZBxXTBM1oeHu15vI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lJPmEb0zQaH+/Ef0OWRCmKBK0x6g+lvEL4MsEeC7lYIXy0nfNDzkNtcZsW92D7ySc RQf/2QwUBZbao0uPaeWdsDZKI7/uDbvvQc8HfIYyruy73IBOOpMZ6LyuNHs8Hx99KZ Fi09DglvxGfWGfL+gRluanwiiqLyJvd4SRNr0rLQ= From: "fkastl at suse dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/110973] 9% 444.namd regression between g:c2a447d840476dbd (2023-08-03 18:47) and g:73da34a538ddc2ad (2023-08-09 20:17) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 11:52:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fkastl at suse dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110973 --- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #3) > There was also a 7.7% regression on zen3 with generic march (these > measurements are without LTO): >=20 > https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D466.120.0 I think this slowdown is caused by the r14-3078-gd9f3ea61fe36e2 commit that Richard mentioned. I measured it on another zen3 machine and got ~7% slowdo= wn.=