From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F37053858D28; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:43:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F37053858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1693320227;
	bh=onQCjHR+oW8y21/RXv8hrraySMZqKACEpC0qxJz8AyI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=u+F2PcSuzLjjWJOwDmj05B6U22Ickoe9C3ACWI2HpNROHdVZz+JtQKoUfIH2WLGCI
	 u60aaX4uNGQUeBCTyrjVetYzXVGp9OPYhti/SKQczZs4Zyj5ZZQv+tOTLyifLl4x08
	 ctBk05Cs98AjbfoslmwJjDYbrtXYTAeZ+luO6XUc=
From: "fkastl at suse dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110973] 9% 444.namd regression between
 g:c2a447d840476dbd (2023-08-03 18:47) and g:73da34a538ddc2ad (2023-08-09
 20:17)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:43:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fkastl at suse dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110973-4-6S7vvXNv9x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110973

--- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl <fkastl at suse dot cz> ---
(In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #7)
> Not all measurements are back to pre-regression. The Ofast zen3 generic
> score that Martin mentioned
> (https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D466.120.0) is
> still higher than before.

There's also these two:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D789.120.0
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D300.120.0

And these benchmarks haven't run yet since the commit that Richard thinks f=
ixes
the regression:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D785.120.0
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D790.120.0
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D288.120.0=