From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4B7AF3858D20; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:33:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4B7AF3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691760804;
	bh=m/NvFwfBvsgMWDNrXseX7Ty96inBfwu2xvD1e0ugzik=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KQ+mRxw1oeKs/xpApVc3ka0Z0UJ/DizDcj72WiRJtW45w5IrqD2kiG0ZnzmtJjS3b
	 et93sBfejOmPqKKUKeNUYlOFoFFMgijHFG5wY28oFT5o4qlfvQMNENVVLWRZdKNaK0
	 HXtHaO3Pj54qWHmo1g1DIgHw4y5lKqmP85Qz68Y4=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110973] 9% 444.namd regression between
 g:c2a447d840476dbd (2023-08-03 18:47) and g:73da34a538ddc2ad (2023-08-09
 20:17)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:33:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cf_gcctarget cc see_also
Message-ID: <bug-110973-4-NNjZ4ysET0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110973

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization,
                   |                            |needs-bisection
             Target|                            |x86_64-*-*
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110972

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Probably the same cause as PR110972, but I can only confirm a 2.5% regressi=
on
on Zen2 due to r14-3078-gd9f3ea61fe36e2.  Looks like the bigger regression =
was
for generic?  I can confirm a 5.5% regression for -Ofast generic on Zen2 du=
e to
r14-3078-gd9f3ea61fe36e2.=